A man is accused of theft but claims he was at home. The only evidence? A broken clock. What does it suggest?
Category: Mystery · Difficulty: medium
Hint: Consider how timing can be a factor in alibis.
Answer
The clock stopped at the time of the theft.
Explanation
If the clock stopped at the time of the theft, it may imply when he was actually present at home.
This is a medium mystery riddle — a moderate challenge for most people. The answer is The clock stopped at the time of the theft..
More Mystery riddles
- A detective found a note with the letters 'R, U, N' scribbled hurriedly. The suspect was caught soon after,…
- A snowy crime scene showed no footprints leading away from the victim. There was no sign of anyone else. How…
- A locked door was found shut with no key in sight, but inside the room was a message claiming the door was…
- At a crime scene, sounds were heard echoing though the room was soundproof. What explained this odd…
- A valuable necklace was stolen but found broken in two pieces with no other damage nearby. What most likely…
- A room full of clues had no fingerprints anywhere. The detective suspected the culprit used what method?
- A letter disappeared from a sealed envelope but the seal remained intact. How did the letter vanish?
- Footsteps were heard in a wooden house, but no doors or windows were opened. How did the sound occur?